Obama Appoints Kagan to Supreme Court

President Barack Obama (D) has nominated Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court to fill the vacancy being left by Justice John Paul Stevens when he retires later this year. She will be Obama’s second appointment to the Court, following his 2009 appointment of Sonia Sotomayor. Kagan is the first Supreme Court appointee with no experience as a judge since William Rehnquist was appointed as an Associate Justice by President Richard Nixon (R) in 1971. Rehnquist was later elevated to Chief Justice by President Ronald Reagan (R).

Kagan had been nominated to the U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia by President Bill Clinton (D) in 1999, however the Republican Congress skirted its Constitutional duty to act on her nomination before the end of Clinton’s presidency. President George W. Bush (R) later nominated John Roberts to that position, and then later appointed him Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Currently serving under Obama as Solicitor General of the United States, Kagan is charged with representing the U.S. government before the Supreme Court. Previously, she had served as Dean of the Harvard Law School and was an Associate White House Counsel under Clinton. Her ideological position is generally being characterized as ‘liberal,’ although with no judicial record to her name it is very difficult to determine with any certainty.

Assuming her nomination is confirmed by the U.S. Senate, Kagan is expected to join the court when it begins its next session in the fall.

Catholicism and the Book of Acts

Msgr. Charles Pope writes on the Archdiocese of Washington blog about the Council of Jerusalem (as recorded in the Book of Acts) and how important an influence it was on the early formation of the Church—and how the Catholic Church, at least, still functions today.

When my non-Catholic Christian friends ask why I became Catholic, my shortest and pithiest response is, “Because I finally actually read the Scripture.”

Years ago I sat down and read the entire Bible, beginning to end, Old Testament and New. It took about six months. I had a sneaking suspicion that I was in the wrong religious community, and hoped that reading the Scripture would help lead me where God really wanted me to go. It worked; though the path it led me down was one I’d have never expected before-hand. The church history recorded in the Book of Acts, more so than anything else in the Scripture, led me to the Catholic Church.

In the Methodist tradition I was part of at the time, denominational decisions are made by democratic conferences of lay and clergy. Some of the faith communities I’d been looking at with interest were ‘congregational’ in structure, where individual churches are essentially autonomous and there is no hierarchical authority of any kind (the Baptist churches are among the most prominent in this tradition). Acts, however, painted a very different picture of how God’s church is supposed to be structured.

At the Council of Jerusalem, recorded in Acts, the elders (Priests) and Apostles (Bishops) gathered in Jerusalem under the leadership of St. Peter (Pope) to figure out how to handle one of the earliest controversies in the church: Was Christianity a sub-set of Judaism, requiring adherence to both traditions, or was it something new that did not require adherence to Jewish practices like circumcision and the dietary laws?

The Council decided, under the guidance of the Holy Sprit, that Gentiles (non-Jews) would not be expected to follow the Jewish traditions to become Christians. The Council then informed all Christian churches that existed at the time of their decision via letters and personal visits, and all churches and all Christians in the world were expected to abide by the Council’s decision. A hierarchical Church as a spiritual authority to which all Christians must be obedient is not some mythical fiction made up by Catholics; it’s all recorded right there in the book of Acts!

I recommend reading Msgr. Pope’s blog entry, as it goes into much more detail than what I’ve covered here (complete with copious references back to the Book of Acts). God bless!

More Public School Constitution Shredding

I’ve written before about public schools shredding the Constitution, and now I’m going to write about it again. This time, the madness comes from Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill, CA.

Five students were sent home from school yesterday under threat of suspension for the grievous offense of wearing clothes with depictions of the American flag on them . . . on Cinco de Mayo . . . at a school with a large Hispanic population. Apparently, in the alternate universe of Morgan Hill, California, wearing an American flag in the United States on a Mexican holiday in a U.S. public school is a very serious offense and can be considered ‘incendiary.’ I would laugh at the stupidity if the erosion of students’ civil liberties wasn’t such a serious issue.

In the United States, we have something called free speech. Under the First Amendment, no government may limit speech or expression except in certain limited circumstances (e.g., yelling ‘fire’ in a crowded theater when there isn’t a fire). Public schools are government entities and are thus bound by the First Amendment. This simple concept seems to be beyond the comprehension of countless public school teachers and administrators. Sadly, the same people charged with teaching our students about civics, liberty, and history often seem to lack a basic grasp of the concepts themselves.

Even if wearing an American flag on Cinco de Mayo in the United States is somehow offensive (which seems pretty ludicrous to begin with), free speech includes the right to offend. If they want, those Hispanic students who were offended can wear Mexican flags on the 4th of July. Students can wear ‘Go Vegetarian!’ shirts on National Meat Day. Students can read from the Qur’an during the Christian Holy Week. That’s what free speech is all about!

We can say what we believe, whether the people around us agree or not. If they disagree, they can use their free speech rights to discuss it with me or make their own statements to the contrary. Public schools have a fundamental responsibility to teach students about these liberties and encourage their exercise, not to trample them.

Spam Madness!

Spam is annoying . . . and I use ‘spam’ in its broadest possible meaning, excluding only the meat product after which it is named. I include unsolicited commercial email, telemarketing calls, junk mail, and countless variations thereof in my definition of ‘spam’ and I hate it all.

The U.S. government’s ‘do not call list‘ is one of the most useful things our federal government has done in decades, and it essentially eliminated the telemarketing calls when I signed up. I have yet to figure out any way of eliminating the others.

Probably 2/3 of the physical postal mail I receive is junk mail, and I see no way of stopping it. I get tons of spam email, though the vast majority of it is filtered out by my service provider and what little makes it through usually gets caught by the Thunderbird mail client.

Scott Bradford is a writer and technologist who has been putting his opinions online since 1995. He believes in three inviolable human rights: life, liberty, and property. He is a Catholic Christian who worships the trinitarian God described in the Nicene Creed. Scott is a husband, nerd, pet lover, and AMC/Jeep enthusiast with a B.S. degree in public administration from George Mason University.