This year’s list of the ugliest cars is actually relatively un-changed from last year, since most of the cars on the list remain in production and have not been seriously re-styled. Only one of last year’s ugly cars has been discontinued—the Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible—but Toyota stepped up to the plate to fill the void will an extremely poor redesign of the Matrix.
All-in-all, most new designs being introduced in the industry are either good looking or, at least, not offensive enough to rank in the top ten ugliest. I’m very glad to see new and redesigned models from Subaru (the Impreza), Chevy (the Traverse), Volkswagen (the CC), and others not looking stupid.
As always, it is important to note that this list is my opinion. I am picky about how cars look, and I tend to be a bit of a minimalist (I’ll take simple shapes and lines over complex and odd angles). You may disagree, and I’m always interested to hear your thoughts!
The Top Ten Ugliest Cars
10.—Perennially hovering just between ‘ugly’ and ‘top-ten ugly’, the Element is really starting to get old and tired. Another minor facelift for 2009 makes slight improvement, but wasn’t quite enough to get it off this list. The Element remains an enigmatic and pointless competitor to Honda’s own CR-V, offering almost the exact same thing for the same price but utterly lacking in any taste or style. Come on, Honda, put this thing to bed.
9. Toyota Matrix—The Matrix, like Honda’s Element, has long hovered at the edges of this list. Its previous design had originally bothered me, but the more I saw it the more it grew on me. Just as the Matrix finally started looking ‘normal’ to me, Toyota introduced this new 2009 version that has clearly been hit with the same ugly-stick Toyota has been overdosing on lately. It has all the blandness of its Corolla cousin, with a bunch of extra misshapen lumps and unpleasing angles added for good measure.
8. Dodge Avenger—essentially the same underlying car—is so much better looking! Putting a Chrysler 300-style grille on the Avenger would be a good stop-gap to fix the Sebring until it can be completely done over.—As a former driver of a Chrysler Cirrus, the Sebring’s predecessor, I still take this one very personally. The company that produced the excellent 300 and the unique and popular PT Cruiser has managed to absolutely botch their efforts at a mid-size sedan, and continues to produce it despite the begging and pleading of Chrysler fans worldwide. Its ribbed hood and ‘eyelash extension’ headlights are cringe-inducing, and the rest of the car isn’t much better. Most perplexing is that the
7. It’s hard to make a sub-compact car look good and more companies fail than succeed at this endeavor. Nissan is no exception to the rule, with the Versa hatchback looking like somebody tried to downsize a minivan and cross it with a sack of potatoes. It takes all of the bad design cues of the Toyota Matrix, which established this segment in the U.S. market, and adds all the worst cues from across Nissan’s relatively unattractive product line.—
6. If the easiest way to describe your car is to make reference to a cheese wedge, then its designers have utterly failed. At this point, there are two barriers to the widespread adoption of hybrid technology as a stop-gap before hydrogen fuel cell: First, hybrids cost at least 10 percent more than a feature-equivalent non-hybrid and give you minimal real-world benefits. They do not pass a rational cost/benefit analysis (otherwise our Honda Civic would have been a ). Second, the few hybrids that aren’t overpriced versions of other cars—like the hybrid-only Prius and the 2010 Honda Insight [look for it on next year’s list]—look stupid and appeal only to hard-core environmentalists.—
5. If you want to know why General Motors is teetering on the verge of bankruptcy, you might start here. Certainly there’s a lot more to the story than the G6 Coupe, but it’s a good illustration. It looks horrible; it isn’t feature competitive with similar coupes offered by Honda, Nissan, and others; nobody buys it; and it still remains in production year after unprofitable year. It’s a throwback to the ‘flying amoeba’ school of curvy, bubble-inspired, edgeless design that reigned supreme among U.S. automakers in the 1990s and gave the Japanese manufacturers their big ‘in’ with the average U.S. Consumer who still had taste. If GM really can’t bring itself to shutter the pointless Pontiac brand, maybe it can at least discontinue this pointless car. Please?—
4. The Yaris, especially in its ‘liftback’ variant, was a real groundbreaker for Toyota. It kicked off a comprehensive effort by the Japanese automaker to make all of its models ugly. The Yaris introduced the new ugly Toyota grille, new ugly Toyota design lumps, and new ugly Toyota disproportionality that have since permeated their product line. It’s not the worst Toyota has to offer anymore, but it was a true trailblazer.—
3. Toyota’s Scion brand web site honestly states that the xB ‘gets attention wherever it goes.’ That’s true, much like train wrecks . . . and bad toupees . . . and urine stains. The current xB design is nominally better than its cardboard-box predecessor, but that’s not saying much. It appeals to people who want to be hip, young, and cutting edge but are too old to actually know if the xB is any of those things. Sorry; it’s not.—
2. Toyota FJ Cruiser—While the 2009 FJ Cruiser hasn’t been officially announced yet, the official Toyota blog reported in October of 2008 that there and it will look essentially identical to the 2008 version. Of course, four months later it’s still MIA. Maybe Toyota has come to its senses and decided to discontinue this monstrous affront to automotive taste and decency. Then again, maybe not. I get the distinct impression that FJ Cruisers will continue to blight the showrooms, in the face of all logic, at least as long as Pontiac’s Aztek did.
1. For the third year in a row, Toyota (including its Scion brand) rules this list with four of the top five positions. Their Scion xD is closely related to the Toyota Yaris, but surpasses the Yaris in every way—longer, larger, more expensive, and uglier. It’s hard to imagine why anybody would purchase this car. There are better looking, better equipped competitors in the same general price range within Toyota’s own product line, and even better looking, better equipped competitors outside like the Honda Fit.—
The Entire Acura Sedan Line—Honda’s luxury marquee, Acura, had possibly the best-looking lineup of luxury sedans on the market a mere two years ago. Since then, they have managed to ruin all three of them. The entry-level, mid-range , and high-end have each been redesigned with gaudy chrome grilles, an unnecessary central hood crease, and more. In fact, many of the frontal design elements from all three models seem to have been lifted directly from the Chrysler Sebring Sedan. The TL is the most offensive of the bunch; its new rear-end makes it look like the car is wearing a horse diaper and like it’s smiling at you all at once.