I supported—and, even in hindsight, continue to support—the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In both cases I believed that we were appropriately justified in military action. Saddam Hussein in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan were evil, genocidal leaders and removing them from power was a moral, righteous act. The mistakes that were made by President George W. Bush (R) and his administration in the execution of these wars didn’t change these underlying facts.
Near the end of his presidency, Bush started to right some of his strategic errors. The ‘troop surge’ in Iraq, for example, was a resounding success. President Barack Obama (D) has announced a somewhat similar ‘surge’ strategy to send an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan, which has been praised by some conservatives, but at the same time he has been criticized for announcing that we will begin withdrawing troops in 2011.
Critics claim that it is great folly to announce a withdrawal date. I understand this argument and, for a long time, subscribed to it myself. If we say we’re leaving Afghanistan in 2011, then the Taliban and al-Qaeda insurgents know exactly how long they need to hold out before they can reassert control of the country. Fair enough. But I no longer subscribe to this argument because I can no longer subscribe to indefinite commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan.





