The Great Tax Dodge, Demystified

An excellent op-ed by Robert J. Samuelson appeared in The Washington Post yesterday about the ‘great tax dodge.’

President Barack Obama (D) and many others have been perennially frustrated by the concept of the multinational corporation. The issue, at least for many big-government types (but others too), is that these multinational corporations don’t pay all their taxes to their home country. Apple Computer, as an example, does not pay U.S. taxes on its foreign manufacturing plants, foreign employees, or foreign sales. Apple pays taxes for its presence and employment in each country according to that country’s laws, even though it is based in the United States.

To some, this presents an excellent opportunity. Let’s apply U.S. taxes to the spoils of U.S. companies for all their business endeavors, even those performed overseas. The problem is that if we do that, U.S. companies will stop operating overseas since the tax burden will become far too onerous. That sounds great for us, until one-by-one every other country starts doing the same thing in return . . . double-taxing their home-based companies and forcing them to give up on manufacturing in the United States. Eventually, the whole multinational system collapses, harming everybody.

Samuelson addresses all of this in his piece, detailing the function of the multinational economic system and concretely demonstrating its benefits for us, and pointing out that punitive taxation on multinational companies will undermine our economy (and the rest of the world’s economies), not help.

Mask We Have Fail (Updated)

Mask We HaveAs submitted to the English Fail Blog (I’ll link to it if they choose to publish it), this sign I saw in my local CVS drug store really made me scratch my head.

“MASK WE HAVE!” it says. “HAVE MASK .99 FOR ONE[,] 25.00 FOR A CASE.”

What mask[s]? And what language was this written in?

I am tempted to ask for a case of the mask they have [?], but on the other hand I’m a little afraid to find out what they’re talking about. Are these anti-swine-flu masks, or used Hillary Clinton Halloween masks, or Israeli gas masks? I’m so confused!

Updated 5/12/2009: This photo has been featured in the English Fail Blog here.

Modern Islamic Insecurity

In 2006, Pope Benedict XVI was giving a speech at Regensburg University in Germany. The Holy Father’s focus that day was about the generally false idea of a ‘Holy War’, and in one small part of his speech he quoted from Byzantine Emperor Manual II Paleologos, a 14th century Christian:

“Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

First and foremost, the words Emperor Paleologos spoke are, basically, true. If you don’t believe me, read the Qur’an. If you don’t believe the Qur’an, study the history of, spread of, and present state of Islam in the world. But regardless of the validity or invalidity of these words, Benedict XVI spoke them as a quote and never once in his speech in 2006 said he agreed with them or endorsed them.

As you might expect, much of the Islamic world flew into a tizzy . . . God forbid that somebody quote dispassionately from a 14th century leader who didn’t like Islam. Perhaps the words of Emperor Paleologos hit close to home?

The Holy Father, of course, apologized publicly for his speech having been grossly misunderstood, but much Muslim anger (likely a manifestation of preexisting hatred) continued seething. Even today, Pope Benedict XVI is being roundly criticized in the Muslim world for quoting somebody else’s words three years ago—words that most thinking, analytic students of Islamic history don’t really have any strong objection to. Many Muslims are still demanding an apology for nothing more than honest, open discussion of the Islamic faith and Islamic history.

This illustrates one simple thing: modern, mainstream Islam is so utterly insecure about itself that it cannot permit honest, innocuous discussion that isn’t laudatory and supportive.

Liberty Crown to Open July 4

Since September 11, 2001, visitors have not been permitted to climb to the crown of the Statue of Liberty in New York. The National Park Service kept it closed for unspecified ‘security reasons’ that were never properly explained, similar to the torch which was closed after a bombing in 1916 and has yet to be reopened to visitors. Of course, visitors to Liberty Island already have to pass through security twice, are permitted to roam the island, and can even enter the base and climb to the foot of the statue. For some reason, people who were considered safe enough to go to the island and enter the statue were too deemed dangerous to climb to the crown or torch.

Well, eight years later, the National Park Service has come (slightly) to its senses. The crown will reopen to visitors on July 4 and remain open for two years. Only ten people will be allowed up at a time (chosen through some sort of yet-undefined lottery system), and the National Park Service is retroactively explaining their near-decade-long closure as being related to the staircase being narrow and potential evacuation difficulties . . . difficulties that apparently didn’t matter for a century, but suddenly started mattering on 9/12/2001. Way to let the terrorists win, guys.

After two years, the statue will be closed again—this time for a major two-year renovation program which will supposedly permit more people to visit the statue’s crown after it reopens. No word on letting people visit the torch, but I’m not holding my breath. No word on the real story (if any) behind the idiotic eight-year closure of one of our national treasures.

Announcing Website 21: Lean, Modernized, and Faster (Updated)

I’m very pleased to announce the launch of a major revision to Off on a Tangent, bringing the site to version 21.0. This is the first major revision since my migration to the WordPress blogging and content management system, and the first since I officially dropped support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6. This change in browser support allowed me significantly improved leeway in writing simple, clean, functional code that takes advantage of the capabilities of modern web browsers. Read on for details about what has changed:

Scott Bradford is a writer and technologist who has been putting his opinions online since 1995. He believes in three inviolable human rights: life, liberty, and property. He is a Catholic Christian who worships the trinitarian God described in the Nicene Creed. Scott is a husband, nerd, pet lover, and AMC/Jeep enthusiast with a B.S. degree in public administration from George Mason University.