Secure in Our Persons

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated . . . ” – United States Constitution, Fourth Amendment.

Before the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, airport security was a private matter. It was somewhat regulated by the government, but the scans themselves were performed by private companies under the auspices of the airlines. The requirement that you submit to a security screening to fly was essentially a private requirement established by a private company as a prerequisite for your utilizing that private company’s services. The Bill of Rights, which limits government authorities, simply doesn’t apply to what private companies do. Airport screeners had an incredible amount of leeway, as long as they didn’t assault you or otherwise break the law.

In the aftermath of 9/11, the U.S. federal government nationalized our transportation security system and established the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). TSA took over airport security across the country and, at least initially, little changed other than what company/organization name was on the screeners’ uniforms. There was an important legal change, however, that is too often overlooked. TSA screeners and screening procedures must now adhere to Constitutional limits on government authority. Airport screeners are not private entities representing private companies anymore; they are government agents that answer to you and me.

God Bless Our Veterans

Today is Veterans Day in the United States. Beginning in 1919 as ‘Armistice Day’ in celebration of the end of World War I, the holiday expanded after World War II to celebrate all veterans. (At right is a 1982 photo of World War I veteran Joseph Ambrose holding the flag that covered the casket of his son, who was killed in the Korean War.)

You may or may not agree with all the times the United States has used military force in the world, but it takes real guts for somebody to volunteer to go wherever their country sends them and lay their life on the line. As the Facebook meme going around today says, “a veteran is someone, who at one point in their life, wrote a blank check payable to the United States of America for an amount up to, and including, their life.” That is no small sacrifice—it’s a lot more than the vast majority of us are willing to do.

Consider whether there is any cause you are willing to die for. Are you willing to die for your faith? For your country? For your family?

The men and women of our military have said they are willing to die for you, and any cause you (through your duly elected president and Congress) consider worthy. Even if you personally disagree with some (or even all) of the times we’ve put our military to use, the men and women who are willing to go where they are sent and do what they are asked without complaint—in simple, obedient service of their country—are among the finest men and women on Earth.

Thank you, veterans. God bless you.

Photos from Election Central

Having a really busy week and haven’t had time to do much writing. Sorry guys. I have a lot of backlogged to-dos to get out of the way and some other commitments. Anyway, in case you were wondering how I covered the election last week, here are three photos from before returns started coming in. This is pretty much my normal office setup, except the TV usually isn’t on ;-).

The real workhorse of the night: My old TI-82 calculator. I got it in 9th grade and it still does the real hard-core heavy lifting when I need to project a race’s outcome from raw returns. I still haven’t found anything that lets me plow through the numbers faster.

My basic setup was broad news coverage on the left (TV tuned to CNN and various news sites on the first computer screen), my site’s live results in the middle, and returns and some media projections on the right.

What If Hyperinflation is the Plan?

I’m not much of a conspiracy theorist, but when I hear that the U.S. Federal Reserve Board voted 9-1 to print another 600 billion dollars I have to start wondering what they’re up to. The Fed., under Chairman Ben Bernanke’s leadership, has already injected over $2 trillion into the economy. All of this ‘quantitative easing’ is supposed to spur growth and economic recovery, but it hasn’t worked yet . . . at all. There’s no reason to think another 600 billion dollars will do the trick.

There’s a lot of funny stuff going on with the numbers. The Consumer Price Index and inflation rates are supposedly dangerously low, but who really thinks their cost of living has gone down or remained stable over the last two years? Anybody? Is it cheaper to gas up your car? Do your groceries cost the same? Oh, wait, fuel and food costs aren’t part of the CPI computations. I guess that’s not an important part of the real cost of living for the real people in this country. I guess those costs are irrelevant when making fundamental policy decisions that will impact the buying power of our national monetary unit.

But something dawned on me today. Bernanke, who was a big part of the Bush/Obama Bailout Bonanza, really pissed me off when he suddenly started sounding like a deficit hawk. I’ve questioned whether his policy ideas are the product of malice or stupidity. But maybe his policies are actually darkly brilliant. Maybe he really is a deficit hawk, and maybe these monetary policies are specifically and intentionally crafted to bring about massive inflation and devaluation of the dollar.

You see, inflation (and even hyperinflation) serves to reduce debts. Let’s say that I make $60,000 per year, have a house that’s worth $400,000, and owe $300,000 on a mortgage. If the Federal Reserve successfully cuts the buying power of the dollar in quarters with crazy inflation, well my salary will end up being $240,000 per year (though with the purchase power my $60,000 used to have), my house’s value goes to $1,600,000, but my mortgage stays fixed at $300,000 and my monthly payment doesn’t change.

Now double, triple, quadruple those inflation rates and before too long my debts are essentially gone . . . peanuts I can pay off with a day’s salary, which won’t make the debt owners happy. Now imagine that you’re a Federal Reserve Chairman in a country with a massive, crushing, and growing national debt. What would hyperinflation do? Amid the social chaos, the national debt (assuming it is held in dollars) evaporates—or at least becomes more manageable. Eventually a ‘new normal’ sets in, each of us trades thousands of dollars in for one ‘New Dollar,’ and life goes on.

We would, of course, have destroyed our credit rating and decimated our debt-holders’ trust, but an argument can be made that this would be better than defaulting or continuing to carry a debt of this scale ($13,713,087,906,377.36 as of 11/01/2010). I’m finding it hard to believe that 9/10ths of the Federal Reserve Board doesn’t have an Econ. 101-level understanding of money and inflation. Maybe they really do know exactly what they’re doing. . . .

Election 2010: Results (Final)

Ballot Races
U.S. House, VA-10th
Jeff Barnett (D):34.81%
Bill Redpath (L):2.21%
Frank Wolf (R):62.87%
Other:0.11%
Ballot Issues
Virginia Tax Amendment #1
Yes:75.92%
No:24.08%
Virginia Tax Amendment #2
Yes:82.41%
No:17.59%
Virginia Rainy Day Amend.
Yes:51.15%
No:48.85%
Loudoun School Bonds
Yes:54.52%
No:45.48%

Scott Bradford is a writer and technologist who has been putting his opinions online since 1995. He believes in three inviolable human rights: life, liberty, and property. He is a Catholic Christian who worships the trinitarian God described in the Nicene Creed. Scott is a husband, nerd, pet lover, and AMC/Jeep enthusiast with a B.S. degree in public administration from George Mason University.