Morning in Washington (Photos)

Had a nice day today. We got up early to meet a friend of ours in Washington, D.C. to see the Nuremberg Laws at the National Archives. The laws were among the first anti-Semitic acts passed by the Nazis in Germany and, after the war, an original copy (with signatures of Adolf Hitler and other Nazi officials) was taken out of the country (illegally) by General George S. Patton. It was a little spooky to see them, given that they were among the first steps toward the senseless murder of six million people.

Unfortunately photography of Archive exhibits is prohibited, but I actually remembered to bring my Canon this time and took some photos before and after of the area around the Archives (including the Sculpture Garden). So, in return for you slogging through my terrible cell-phone pictures from Baltimore, here are some real photos of Washington, D.C.

Ben Bernanke: Malice or Stupidity?

There is an old saying that I have long appreciated (popularized by one of my favorite authors, Robert A. Heinlein): ‘Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.’

The more I observe the tenure of Ben Bernanke as Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, the more this saying pops into my head. It’s an unfortunate truth that we can no longer describe Bernanke in anything but these terms, if we are being honest. He’s either trying to maliciously undermine the U.S. economy, or he is an idiot who has absolutely no idea whatsoever what he is doing. I’m beginning to suspect the latter, although neither would surprise me at this point.

Once again, the economic mess we find ourselves in has been foisted upon us by leaders of both the Democratic and Republican parties, so this is a bipartisan slam. Bernanke is perhaps unique in that he, in his central banking role, has been there throughout the entire thing. He’s been part of every bailout, every big-government spending plan, every ‘investment’ of your tax dollars in private industry, every ‘stimulus’ and ‘recovery’ plan, etc. President George W. Bush (R) appointed Bernanke to his position in 2006 and then, in a stunning example of ‘change we can believe in,’ President Barack Obama (D) reappointed him earlier this year. I guess Obama really did like Bush’s economic policies, since most of Obama’s economic team are holdovers from the Bush era.

If it isn’t evident yet, let me put this in plain English: Bernanke is part of the problem and, thus, is unlikely to be part of the solution. For example, the Washington Post reported this morning that Bernanke is gearing up for another Federal Reserve intervention in our economy (since it’s been working so well so far). This would be another ‘print billions of dollars out of thin air’ kind of exercise, since Bernanke and others still insist that our inflation rate is too low. Of course, the inflation rate they use to make these determinations conveniently excludes things like food and fuel and, as such, aren’t an accurate reflection of actual consumer prices or changes in the cost of living. In fact, consumer prices for food and fuel are seeing significant inflation right now (ask anybody who drives, heats their home, or eats).

Each Federal Reserve injection of money into the economy—euphemistically called ‘quantitative easing’—has been counterproductive. These injections, like an illegal drug, seem to have short-term positive effects but ultimately harm their recipient. They serve to further depress our economy and stave off a real recovery by introducing unnecessary uncertainty into the market, discouraging private investment and saving, and calling into question the stability of the dollar. We are already seeing inflation, cleverly masked by selective exclusion of certain products from the averages, and this will accelerate with any additional ‘quantitative easing’ until we find ourselves in the midst of a new crisis of inflation and, quite possibly, hyperinflation.

So the question is this: is Bernanke so dumb he doesn’t see it, or is he so evil that he doesn’t care? Either way, should he be the man in charge of our national monetary policy?

No, Public Schools Aren’t Licensed Spy Agencies

You may remember back in February when I wrote about an emerging controversy in Pennsylvania involving the Lower Merion School District. The district, like many others in the U.S., made laptop computers available to its students. If they paid for some insurance, they were permitted to take the laptops home. This is all quite innocuous, until you found out about the student who had been spied on by the school and punished for something they caught him doing at home. Yes, the school was turning on the laptop webcams and taking pictures of students without their or their parents’ knowledge.

The school claimed at the time that it only activated the webcams when a laptop was reported stolen, but that was clearly untrue and the factual discrepancy was never explained. Why was the webcam used on a student who’s laptop had not been stolen? Why were those photos reviewed by the school? Why did photos of a student taken at his home lead to disciplinary action at his school?

During the legal proceedings, a lot of new information came out. The student who’s family brought the issue to court had been photographed more than 400 times without his or his parents’ consent. The school had taken thousands of photos from other students’ laptops. The school had taken screenshots’ of students’ private instant messaging conversations. Photos that were taken and retained by the school included some photos of students partially undressed (likely assuming the nearby laptop would not be taking pictures of them)—something that, in any other universe, would be considered child pornography, but is apparently a-okay if a school does it.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation looked into the matter and, inexplicably, determined that federal wiretap and child pornography laws had not been violated (which really makes me question the FBI’s institutional sanity, since this is clearly a violation of both), but some of the families affected pursued civil complaints against the school system. Likely fearing that they would lose (and I’m sure they would’ve), the Lower Merion School District chose to settle out of court. While I am disappointed that the school district chose not to let the legal system run its course and rip them to well-deserved shreds, at least this debacle has cost them over $600,000.

Maybe this will send a message to Lower Merion and countless other school systems across the United States: you are not parents, you are not dictators, and you are not a licensed spy agency. Start teaching. Stop trying to be Big Brother, the CIA, parents, and pedophiles all rolled into one.

Weekend in Baltimore (With Tons of Photos)

Melissa and I had a great weekend up in Baltimore, Maryland. It was a kind-of mini-vacation, since we (mostly Melissa) have been really busy for the last several weeks. It was good to get away together for the weekend and relax and do a little touristing. We went up on Friday night, stayed the night at the Sheraton Inner Harbor Hotel Friday and Saturday night, and came back this afternoon.

On Saturday we took it easy, walked around the Inner Harbor, went to the National Aquarium, had a nice dinner at an Irish Pub, and that was really about it. I also posted some Chuck Norris ‘facts’ on my Facebook wall. Heh.

Then this morning we had a nice breakfast at the hotel’s restaurant before heading to Mass at St. Alphonsus Catholic Church (which is also the St. John Neumann Shrine; it’s a beautiful, historic church that goes back to 1845). We went there instead of the nearby Baltimore Basilica at the recommendation of our Pastor, Fr. Hathaway, but we did visit the Basilica afterwards.

We chose to go to the 11:30 a.m. ‘Tridentine’ Mass, which is now properly called ‘an extraordinary form of the Roman Rite.’ This was the Roman Catholic order of Mass used from 1570 to 1962 before being replaced with the current ‘Ordinary’ Mass, or Novus Ordo, after the Second Vatican Council. The Tridentine Mass is still permitted and is still a valid Catholic Mass, but is pretty rarely used nowadays.

The Accidental Public School Criminal

Seven-year-old Samuel Burgos was playing with a toy gun like millions of children do every day. In an effort to hide the toy from a sibling, he stuck it in a bag. Later, forgetting the toy was there, he took the bag to school. For this grievous offense, he was suspended and then expelled under the school’s zero-tolerance weapons policy, which apparently applies to clear, plastic toys in the approximate shape of a firearm being carried by forgetful seven-year-olds. Poor Burgos never removed the toy from his bag, never threatened anybody, and never intended any harm. Despite this, his academic record is now blighted with expulsion and his family is forced to find him alternative academic arrangements (they are home-schooling him for now).

This easily could have been me. When I was in school, I was a Boy Scout. My backpack sometimes served school purposes during the week and Boy Scout purposes on the weekend. Usually this posed no problem, but at least a couple of times I discovered (either during the school day or after) that I had left some Boy Scout accoutrement in one of the bag’s pockets. More than once, I unintentionally took a pocket-knife, matches, or some other so-called ‘weapon’ to school. I never took them out of the bag, never intended any harm, never threatened anybody . . . but if I had been caught in the midst of this honest, harmless mistake, I would have shared Burgos’s fate.

A sufficient punishment for a minor error like this that results in no harm? Um, how about a stern talking-to and sending the child home to his parents for the day? That’s probably the ‘upper limit.’ Trying to permanently derail the student’s life is obvious overkill. Shouldn’t we be teaching our children that punishments should be proportional to crimes?

If Burgos had brought a real gun to school (without any ill intent), that would warrant a year’s expulsion easily. With ill intent, maybe permanent expulsion. But we’re not talking about a real gun, we’re talking about a toy. And we’re not talking about an angry, anti-social teenager, we’re talking about a seven-year-old. We’re talking about a ‘crime’ that, in reality, probably only warranted the confiscation of the toy for the day as a potential distraction and a stern reminder that such things shouldn’t be brought to school. The end. ‘Problem’ solved, and no lives destroyed.

Once more, we are seeing a public school system so hung-up on hyper-disciplinarianism that it can’t even see the abject absurdity of its actions. Our schools don’t have time to spend a single day in twelve years teaching the history of the Weimar Republic (for example), but they seem to have plenty of time for insane over-punishment, anti-‘anarchist’ harassment, publication censorship, idiotic dress codes, urination enforcement, being a drug dispensary, monitoring private parties, taking illegal photos of students in their homes, harassing students for loving their country, and more. And we wonder why our education system ranks so low among ‘first world’ nations.

Scott Bradford is a writer and technologist who has been putting his opinions online since 1995. He believes in three inviolable human rights: life, liberty, and property. He is a Catholic Christian who worships the trinitarian God described in the Nicene Creed. Scott is a husband, nerd, pet lover, and AMC/Jeep enthusiast with a B.S. degree in public administration from George Mason University.